UPDATE: A video of the debate is available on YouTube. On Monday, August 15, I will engage with Texas A&M Professor Andrew Dessler in an Oxford-style debate hosted by the SoHo Forum. We’ll debate the resolution “Climate science compels us to make large and rapid reductions in greenhouse gas emissions”, Dessler taking the affirmative, and I the negative. Our separate back-to-back conversations with Joe Rogan this past winter (I here and Dessler here) show very different perspectives on climate and energy, so it should be an interesting debate.

[A related Wall Street Journal OpEd is here.] A PolitiFact “fact check” written by Jon Greenberg has examined my statement Greenland’s ice sheet isn’t shrinking any more rapidly today than it was 80 years ago. and found it “mostly false.” Greenberg supports his finding by noting that “In the 1930s…

Earlier this month, Steven Vigdor and Tim Londergan, two nuclear physicists who co-author the blog “Debunking Denial,” published a critique of my book Unsettled on their blog. As I say in Unsettled, I encourage informed and good-faith criticisms of what I’ve written. To that end, here I offer responses to…

[NB: Scientific American declined, without reason, to publish this response.] Scientific American has published a criticism of me and my recent book, Unsettled. Most of that article’s 1,000 words are scurrilous ad hominem and guilt-by-association aspersions from the twelve co-authors. Only three scientific criticisms are buried within their spluttering; here…

This document is a detailed response to Climate Feedback’s “fact check” of Mark Mills’ Wall Street Journal review of my book, Unsettled. An OpEd published in the physical Journal on May 17, 2021 provides a high-level summary of the situation. There follows below a point-by-point response to Climate Feedback’s “fact…